This paper covers three things:
- RSK Prequalification Assessment from which one can adduce their suitability, and the validity of their report.
- Risk Assessments,
- Who to complain to.
- An Engineers letter to Councillors and MSP's, and one to Paul McCabe [a Councillor]
RSK - Prequalification Assessment
RSK Prequalification Assessment
What follows is what can be found out about RSK Geosciences from the web.
Companies House Data
Their name is actually RSK Environment Limited as it states in the report. Companies house shows that their structure, etc is as follows:
- Company Number: SC115530 - Private limited Company registered in Scotland.
- Address: 65 Sussex Street, Glasgow, Scotland, G41 1DX
- Company Secretary: Sally Evans, Appointed on 9 August 2019
- There are 55 Directors.
- There are 2 "persons with significant control", namely:
- Ares Management Limited [a corporate body, Company No: 05837428] of 5th Floor, 6 St Andrew Street, London, England, EC4A 3AE. The "control" is Ownership of shares – 75% or more.
- Rsk Group Limited [a Private Company Limited By Shares, Company No: 03761340] of Spring Lodge, 172 Chester Road, Helsby, Cheshire, WA6 0AR. The "control" is Ownership of voting rights - 75% or more as well as the Right to appoint and remove directors.
- The company has had two previous names apart from it's "off the shelf" name:
- RSK ENSR ENVIRONMENT LIMITED from 03 Apr 2003 - 22 Jan 2007
- R.S.K. ENVIRONMENT LIMITED from 8 May 1989 - 03 Apr 2003
- It's areas of trading [viz it's SIC Codes] are as follows:
- 39000 - Remediation activities and other waste management services
- 42990 - Construction of other civil engineering projects not elsewhere classified
- 71122 - Engineering related scientific and technical consulting activities
- 74901 - Environmental consulting activities
- Noted that code 74206 Geophysical, geologic and seismic surveying, Geologist (consultant) is NOT included.
- The Shareholding [all transferred to Ares Management Ltd on 6th August 2021 from RSK Group Limited] is as follows:
- 22,543 Ordinary Shares
- 4,477 Ordinary A Shares
- 382 Ordinary B Shares
- The accounts for 1997 show a profit of some £223,000 in a business mainly associated with realising landfill.
- By 2021, they had become an American owned investment group with a turnover of some £40 Million [down from £55 Million the previous year] showing a profit of £29 Million with 489 people [down from 547 in 2020].
- The accounts also indicate a large number of subsidiaries NONE of which mention "Geology" in their scope of business.
So much for the data on RSK Environment Limited. So who are the other two companies which are effectively in control ?
Starting with Ares Management Limited. Companies House reports as follows:
Ares Management Corporation,
- Address: 2000 Avenue Of The Stars, 12th Floor, Los Angeles, California, United States, 90067
- Capitalisation £28,000,000
Enough said.
Report Conclusions
The report was produced by an organisation experienced in landfill and water, rather than a firm of Geological Consultants.
No more comment is required as the following questions remain unanswered:
- The time scales within which another rockfall can be expected.
- The extent of another rockfall in terms of size and damage.
Without this information, the report is in effect invalidated as not providing adequate information with which to assess the risk.
Path Closure - Risk Assessments
Risk Assessments
Glasgow City Council including the Parks Department have simply not assessed the other risks that have been created by closure of the path which include:
- Trapping people who have inadvertently entered a partially fenced are by legitimate means and then find themselves trapped.
- Forcing people to use an alternative route, which is known to be unsafe - viz the narrow part of Old Castle Road past the castle. This applies to people who:
- are in a wheel chair for which the path adjacent to the narrow part of Old Castle Road past the castle is impossible to pass - considering that they may well have entered at Netherlee.
- have a buggy and young children for which the path adjacent to the narrow part of Old Castle Road past the castle is highly unsuitable.
- are on a bicycle, possibly hauling a small trailer for the carriage of young children or which the path adjacent to the narrow part of Old Castle Road past the castle is impossible.
- as pedestrian visitors who naturally assume that walking down the narrow part of Old Castle Road past the castle is safe.
- Noted that cars often pass down the narrow section of Old Castle Road past the castle at speeds well in excess of the speed limit.
- Noted that there are many other places in Linn Park where higher safety risks exist - hung trees, poor fencing, ruins, etc etc.
One can immediately conclude that it would be much much safer for the community and visitors for the path to be re-opened immediately.
Path Closure - Who to complain to
Who to complain to:
Linn Ward Councillors [information taken from https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/]:
- Margaret Morgan (SNP) - Phone: 0141 287 0224, Email: margaret.morgan@glasgow.gov.uk
- Paul McCabe (SNP) - Phone: 0141 287 4663, Email: Paul.McCabe@glasgow.gov.uk
- John Carson (Labour ) - Phone: 0141 287 3937, Email: john.carson@glasgow.gov.uk
- Catherine Vallis (Labour) - Phone: 0141 287 7031, Email: Catherine.Vallis@glasgow.gov.uk
MSP's [https://www.parliament.scot/msps/current-and-previous-msps]
Glasgow Constituency MSP
- James Dornan (SNP) - Phone: 0141 632 5238 , Email: James.Dornan.msp@parliament.scot
Glasgow List MSP's [Please note: only one MSP is allowed to help you at a time]:
- Anas Sarwar (Labour) - Phone: 0141 , Email: Anas.Sarwar.msp@parliament.scot
- Dr. Sandesh Gulhane (Conservative) - Phone: 0141 946 3335, Email: Sandesh.Gulhane.msp@parliament.scot
- Pauline McNeill (Labour) - Phone: 0131 348 6475, Email: Pauline.McNeill.msp@parliament.scot
- Paul Sweeney (Labour) - Phone:0131 348 6388, Email: Paul.Sweeney.msp@parliament.scot
- Patrick Harvie (Green) - Phone: [None Given], Email: Patrick.Harvie.msp@parliament.scot
- Annie Wells (Conservative) - Phone: 0131 348 5991, Email: Annie.Wells.msp@parliament.scot
- Pam Duncan-Glancy (Labour) - Phone: 0141 378 6748, Email: Pam.Duncan-Glancy.msp@parliament.scot
Letters to Councillors and MSP's
Email to Glasgow City Councillors for Linn Ward, and Local MSP, and Glasgow List MSP's
A Chartered Engineer's Letter to Glasgow City Councillors for Linn Ward, and Local MSP, and Glasgow List MSP's
Sent: 14 June 2022 22:55
Subject: Linn Park - Path Closure
Dear ....
I wish to draw to your attention the ongoing closure (in excess of 6 months now) of the entrance to Linn Park from the junction of Greenock Avenue and Snuff Mill Road. This is immediately adjacent to the house I share with my partner and which abuts the first section of the path.
As we understand the situation the Council has had a desk study undertaken, but has not acted on any of the recommendations. Rather it has chosen to “close” this very popular and important entrance to the park in a bid to stop use of the path. I put close in inverted commas as none of the closure methods have been effective, demonstrating the public demand for this path to be re-opened. It is particularly important as it is part of the a very popular circular walk through the park and along the footpath on the west bank of the river.
After several failed attempts to block the Greenock Avenue entrance the Council brought in blacksmiths to close the gates, which have probably been jammed open for 50 or more years. It has also erected various forms of barrier at the park end of the path. Whilst the gates have remained closed the adjacent fences, which were not in good condition, have now been comprehensively dismantled and users of all ages and abilities regularly enter and exit here. At the other end the barriers erected and re-erected are regularly dismantled and circumvented. What a waste of money and energy.
I am a Chartered civil engineer and whilst not a geotechnical specialist I am quite conversant with the undertaking and application of risk assessments. It seems to me that by following what is deemed to be a “sensible” approach the Council is in fact increasing risk as people climb through and over fences and walk adjacent to the river bank, etc. as they are determined to get through at all costs. However as the path is no longer continuously in use, if they were to have an accident, they may remain undetected for some time and not get the help they would need. Whilst a rock fall may be a risk it would seem to be the least of current risks. The rocks which fell formed a short ridge and all of the visible rocks have fallen, there are no obvious rocks in danger of an imminent fall. However ongoing use is creating at least 3 additional risks each time the path is traversed, an incident on the fence at either end and the risk of being injured and not detected for some time, should an accident occur on the path.
It is notable that there are no diversion signs, if this was a public road, there would have to be such signs. The obvious alternative route is to use the park entrance at Seil Drive, however to reach that location pedestrians have to either cross Old Castle Road twice (as only footpath is on north side) or walk on the narrow, undulating and twisting carriageway. Cyclists have no choice but the cycle on the unsatisfactory road. So the displaced users are subject to further risks.
We fully appreciate that the Council has financial constraints and accordingly it is important that a correct balance of costs and risk is achieved. A key failing of the RSK report is that they only identify the level of risk and not the likelihood. The normal approach to risk assessment is to estimate both the level of and likelihood of risk and combine these to produce a “risk score”. The score can then be used in assessing a range of costed options to make realistic and meaningful decisions. A high risk with a low probability may not warrant significant expenditure, but rather observation and management. In this regard I would cite the management of the A83 at the Rest and Be Thankful, where the road is kept open and only closed when an incident occurs or is deemed imminent. We see no sign that any such judgement is being applied, rather the Council is hiding behind the report by RSK Consultants. If the path was reopened park rangers could make regular visual inspections, this is not skilled job, if they note any change then they can alert other more skilled staff to examine the situation in more detail. To put this incident in context no one with local knowledge is aware of any previous rock falls in this area.
I hope you and your colleagues will raise this matter with the relevant officials and budget holders to restore this important local amenity, preferably, before the start of the school holidays.
Note: Sadly no responses have been received
Email to Paul McCabe
A Chartered Engineer's Email to Glasgow City Councillor Paul McCabe [SNP]
Sent: 23 July 2022 16:49
Subject: Follow Up - Linn Park - Path Closure
Dear Baillie McCabe
Further to the above I am aware that the Linn Area Committee met on 30 June under your chairmanship and at that meeting:
- Item 1 relating to expenditure of £12,500 on the White Cart Walkway was deferred for further information.
- Item 2 relating to Linn Castle Phase 2 (there is a Cathcart Castle, but I am not aware of a Linn Castle) was approved.
Can you advise if either of these relate to the issue of the rock fall and the reopening the entrance to the park? If indeed they do when is work being undertaken?
I note that some £26,000 remains unallocated from Local Parks & Open Space Improvement Fund in the current financial year. Surely this is a priority matter?
Notwithstanding the above matters have you heard further from the officers as to why the entrance remains closed when there is no overt risk and an appropriate risk management strategy should address the immediate concerns?
Regards
Note: Sadly no response was received
Email to John Carson
Another Chartered Engineer's Email to Glasgow City Councillor John Carson (Labour )
Sent: 21st November 2022 16:23
Subject: Linn Park
John
Congratulations [on being elected to the Linn Ward].
I am sure you are being inundated with emails left right and centre.
I drink in the Old Smiddy [and have done so for nearly 40 years] and know Archie Graham quite well ... !!! He suggested I email you.
On Linnpark.org.uk which takes you to https://tdocplus.co.uk/linnpark/ there are three articles on the front page: - one is "sign the petition" where as of now we have 1,179 signatures.
The next article is about what caused the closure. Basically a knee jerk reaction to a few small boulders coming slowly down the slope in a period of a week. Not one boulder was travelling fast enough to go right across the path into the fence, let alone do the fence any damage. One small boulder came down before the fence was erected ! We had been expecting this for several years.
There are lots of worse hazards in the park - "hung trees" i.e. ones which have fallen and now "hang" on an adjacent tree. When these come down, they do so in a very short time - may be 10 seconds, and the bottom end "kicks". Another is the old septic tank in the bottom wood [below the stables].
When the path was closed off no safety analysis was carried out regarding the diversion of people and bikes. We suggested a map, and now a year later a wee map has appeared - one at the snuff mill entrance, and one by the single-leaved ash at the corner of the 2m high chain link fence [claimed one death so far]. We are are of the opinion that the elderly gentleman from Busby found dead in the river at the Snuff Mill Bridge probably fell when clambering around the council's obstruction.
The safety case is simple: forcing people in wheel chairs up and down Old Castle Road is simply daft. Let alone all the groups of old ladies - many of them tourists ! At 75 and three heart attacks I appreciate the dangers. The road is lethal, and the path is not much better due to is uneven nature, steps, and adverse camber. I mostly divert via Court Knowe.
Lastly the report written for the council. We obtained it by FOI. We have read it and marked it up.
https://tdocplus.co.uk/linnpark/images/20220101_RSK-Geo_GCC_LP_Cliff_Report_s.pdf
RSK Geosciences are not really competent to write the report they did. It is a farce. It cannot be classed as a serious Engineering Document but more of a political statement by a firm whose main investor specialises in "monetising" "the managed asset". In this case it means getting their associated companies to RSK to put up protective measures - whenever there is a chance.
I did the Prequalification Report on RSK, and the Chartered Engineer who lives in the White House at the entrance and who is somewhat senior in Jacobs Engineering wrote the letter and email which were sent to all ward Councillors and relevant MSPs. No replies were received.
We would be delighted to take you round and explain what has happened so that you are then in a position to make a forceful and reasoned case for re-opening the path. Followed by a treating you to a pint in the Smiddy where the chances of not finding Archie are remote !
All the best and hope to hear from you. Tom Ritchie and I normally meet at 4pm at the Snuff Mill Bridge every Wednesday.
Email to Patrick Harvie MSP
Sent: 20 April 2023 11:19am
Subject: Walking - Access to Linn Park
Patrick
I received your leaflet a few days ago.
Glasgow City Council have acted in an extremely foolish manner in closing the access to Linn Park to the east of the Snuffmill Bridge.
The reason they closed the path was knee jerk reaction to a few small rocks [the largest 600 mm in diameter] which descended from a ledge which has quietly been eroded by water over the last century or so. In fact these ricks slid down taking a number of days to get from the ledge to the path.
This is quite common in many areas of Scotland which are open to the public.
The alternative route is fraught with difficulty for all but the young and fit. Wheel Chairs, Bicycles, Prams, etc are all required to use a path which has a transverse slope, and a number of steps.
As a Chartered Engineer who has built roads and tunnels in similar geology in East Africa, I have some experience of what I am talking about.
PLEASE SEE the Linn Park web site where we have analysed the safety situation and concluded that there is no case for closing the path. In fact it makes life much MORE DANGEROUS. Elderly tourists [ladies] walking down Old Castle Road is an event waiting to happen
The history is here:
https://tdocplus.co.uk/linnpark/information-on-the-park/path-closure/248-closure-of-the-path-below-the-castle
The council's report states that the cliff is in imminent danger of collapse. After 18 months, not a single grain has descended.
One person [an elderly man] has drowned after falling into the river attempting to climb past the obstructive blockade erected at not inconsiderable and totally unnecessary expense.
https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/body-found-glasgow-amid-search-26358752
It is time that someone applied a bit of common sense. As the weather improves, the number of people using an unsatisfactory route is high. This is evidenced by the number of people signing the petition.
It is utterly pathetic that neither local councillors nor the head of CRAP [Cleansing Roads and Parks] has had the decency to reply to our communications except in the most negative of terms.
I would suggest that you visit the site, and I can explain in what should happen, and that no works are required except to remove the unsightly fences etc, which are best described as a disgrace.
Richard
PS on Monday last a small section of the wall along Old Castle Road opposite the Castle entrance was struck by a lorry and two large blocks of stone knocked out of it - leaving a dangerous situation. The council removed one such block, and left the other. The stability of the wall remains in doubt - another block falling out could easily cause a head on collision between two vehicles - many of which ignore he 20 mph limit.
--
Eur Ing Richard Townsend-Rose MA CEng MICE
Phone: 0141 237 8293
Mobile: 07770 460862
LinnPark.org.uk